Day 7

Today, I started by writing my abstract, which is a short summary of the project on which I am working this summer. (The abstract is included in my last post.) To write my abstract, I needed to develop a clear idea of my project. I found that summarizing it in writing actually helped me to better understand what I am doing as a whole. After completing and posting my abstract, I returned to my experiment. I first set out to solve the problem of incorrect dimensions in my data, which I had run into on the previous day. I took out the code that reshaped the data, because the data had to be in their original dimensions for the preprocessing methods to function correctly. However, this meant that I had to rewrite the code that split the data by labels into training and testing categories. I had to use an entirely different strategy than I had been using before. Instead of directly splitting the data into two arrays, I am now creating an array of the indices of the data values in the original array and using that index array to categorize the training and testing data. Ryan helped me with this strategy. I am now trying to create a training array by using the index array to iterate through the original data and keep only the data to be used for training.

Also, today was my last day before I go out of town for a week for a running camp with my cross country team, so I will not be back in the lab until the week after next.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Day 6

I began today by finishing the documentation I had been doing of the code for my experiment. After that, I began working on new code that would test the performance of data preprocessing methods that were already written. I am using the Pavia University scene, which is a set of labeled hyperspectral data. I began to write code to run the experiment, which will include testing various preprocessing methods each with thirty trials. In the process, I used the code from my first tutorial as a reference, and I found an error in that code that had been making it run too slowly. It had been using too much data to train. I fixed this issue, making that code run more quickly, and continued with the code for my experiment. Eventually, in my experiment code, I ran into a problem: I was shaping the data into different dimensions to split it into training and testing groups, but it had to be in its original dimensions to be used by the preprocessing methods. I am still working on this issue, and I ...
Read more

Day 14

Today I continued testing different parameters for the MLP classifier. While I ran tests, I finished documenting the classifiers that I am testing. I also wrote an introduction to my descriptions of the preprocessing methods, finished citations for the descriptions, and wrote a summary of my preprocessing experiment in an article being written in Overleaf about the machine learning pipeline. Although I am not yet ready to test the next classifier, RandomForest, I began writing code to test for the optimal preprocessing methods and parameters to use with it. Throughout the day, I collected data on the metrics of different combinations of parameters for MLP. I looked through this data and ran a larger number of trials on the most promising parameters, but it still appears that the default parameters are the most accurate, even though the overall accuracy resulting from the default parameters averages at about seventy percent, which is not very good compared to the other two classifiers I...
Read more

Day 3

Today I began by implementing the changes in the tutorial that Ron and I had previously discussed. I used arrays in my code instead of multilevel lists, because the machine learning program requires arrays. I then used two different machine learning programs, one linear and one non-linear, to process the training data and predict the second array of testing data based on the first. The linear learning program (a Linear Support Vector Machine) was more successful and now only takes about two minutes to train and make its predictions. I ran metrics to test the accuracy of the linear program, such as overall accuracy, mean-class accuracy, and kappa statistic, and it proved to be fairly accurate. Later in the tutorial, the accuracy will be improved with further measures. However, the non-linear program (a Support Vector Machine with Radial Basis Function kernel) is still too slow and inefficient. I am not certain why this is, but tomorrow I hope to fix this issue.
Read more